5 Essential Legal Issues to Review Before Securing Venture Capital

According to The MoneyTree™ Report by PricewaterhouseCoopers and the National Venture Capital Association based on data from Thomson Reuters, venture capitalists invested US$13.0 billion in 1,114 deals in the second quarter of 2014, which is the most money invested in a quarter since the first quarter of 2001. The PwC/NVCA MoneyTree Report further notes that companies receiving a venture investment for the first time accounted for 32 percent of the 1,114 deals completed last quarter. So what are these venture funds and other professional investor groups looking for? In a blog post for JumpStart, Squire Patton Boggs lawyer Andrew Renacci looks at five of the more important legal issues that professional investors are likely to review in a standard due diligence process before deciding to make an investment in an early-stage company. This article is linked with the permission of the publisher. Read the full article>

Congress Votes Contempt for Former Internal Revenue Service Director

The House of Representatives has voted to hold Lois Lerner, the former Director of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Exempt Organizations Division, in contempt. Ms. Lerner was implicated in allegations that the IRS targeted tax-exempt organizations for heightened scrutiny based on the nonprofits’ political affiliations. Indeed, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration eventually found that the IRS used “inappropriate criteria” in reviewing applications for tax-exempt status. The 231-187 vote for contempt largely tracked political party lines, as did the 250-168 vote approving a separate nonbinding resolution calling upon the Attorney General to appoint special counsel to investigate the IRS targeting. Read the full article>

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Important Political Speech Argument

On Tuesday April 22, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument about a law that prohibits false attacks on politicians. The case will likely contribute to existing jurisprudence on political speech. At issue in Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus are ads designed to attack political opponents. Fifteen states, including Ohio, have ‘truth in politics’ laws. The Ohio statute prohibits attacking politicians with intentionally false statements regarding their respective voting records and does not allow publication of statements that are knowingly or recklessly false. Violations of the statute could result in criminal charges. The advertisement at issue accused a re-election candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives, Steven Driehaus, of voting for publicly-funded abortions. Driehaus did not cast such a vote; the ad was allegedly based on his vote in favor of the Affordable Care Act. The federal trial court and Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals have declined to hear lawsuits challenging the Ohio law on procedural grounds – primarily that the lawsuits were not “ripe” for decision because the publishers of the ad could not show they had been injured and had not been prosecuted for violating the law. Read the full article>

Appellate Court Tightens the Reins on Foreign Antitrust Enforcement

The development of case law regarding jurisdictional limits on U.S. antitrust law continued last week when the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recognized limits on a private litigant’s ability to hold a foreign corporation responsible for Sherman Act violations. The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (“FTAIA”) dictates how the primary U.S. antitrust law, the Sherman Act, can apply to foreign commerce. Overseas commerce is only subject to U.S. antitrust restraints if it has a “direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect” on commerce in the United States – and if the conduct raises a claim under the Sherman Act for price-fixing, market allocation, or other prohibited conduct. Read the full article>

FDIC Sues Banks Over Libor Price-Fixing

More than a dozen major financial institutions continued to experience fallout from the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) investigation of London Interbank Offered Rate (“Libor”) price-fixing when the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) sued them late last week. The FDIC filed suit in the Southern District of New York on behalf of 38 banks as the receiver for 38 banks that failed during the 2008 global financial crisis, including IndyMac Bank FSB and Washington Mutual Bank. The Libor is one of the key benchmarks that affect the ability to borrow money, and the FDIC lawsuit claims that efforts to unlawfully fix the Libor increased borrowing costs for the failed institutions. Submissions designed to inflate the Libor may also have masked financial weaknesses among many of the world’s largest banks, contributing further to instability in the financial markets. Read the full article>

Defense Lawyers Continue to Pressure the Justice Department over Disclosure Rules

On February 21, 2014, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (“NACDL”) sued the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to obtain DOJ’s internal guidance regarding the government’s disclosure obligations to criminal defense lawyers. The lawsuit follows a well-publicized denial of NACDL’s Freedom of Information Act request for the internal guidance, which is known as the “Federal Criminal Discovery Blue Book.” The right to due process under the U.S. Constitution guarantees that information material to a defendant’s guilt or innocence must be disclosed by prosecutors. The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently recognized this right since its landmark decision in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). Read the full article>

Latest Antitrust Developments Point to Continued Robust Enforcement

We were reminded recently that two of the most widespread and lucrative antitrust investigations in the history of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division (the “Division”) remain very active and are likely to remain as such well into the future. Read the full article>

Freedom of Speech on the Internet: The Power of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

Experienced First Amendment lawyers know that websites hosting user-created content are extremely difficult to sue for defamation. This is due to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 230 (the “CDA”), which establishes broad immunity against tort claims for Internet websites. Read the full article>

Should the Government’s Ability to Use Conspiracy Charges Be Limited?

Last week, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division (the “Division”) filed a motion for rehearing after significant criminal convictions were overturned on statute of limitations grounds. A conspiracy is deemed to continue until the last “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy, which means a conspiracy could conceivably occur over the course of several years. See 18 U.S.C. § 371. Any opinion that curtails the Justice Department’s ability to rely on conspiracy theory to expand the scope of illegal conduct alleged in an indictment, or to rely on subsequent conduct to satisfy statutes of limitation, has potentially significant consequences for antitrust conspiracy law going forward. Read the full article>

Qatar 2013: A Year in Review

The top headline from 2013 was the resignation of His Highness, the Father Emir, and the appointment of His Highness, Sheikh Tamim Bin Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani, as the new Emir of the State of Qatar. Read the full article>